28 February 2009 · Comments Off on Stereotypes: Blast from the Past Dept. · Categories: First Looks

I mentioned the “Watermelon Mayor” here. (By the way, he’s resigned as mayor.)

If you just don’t get what the fuss was about, read this.

Oh, heck. Read it anyway. It’s worth three minutes of your time.

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on Motherhood · Categories: First Looks

I’ve pretty much stayed away from Nadya Suleman except for one drive-by post, but, honest to Pete, this is worth reading. (This blog lives up to its name.)

Minor Quibbles Below

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on The President’s Weekly Address · Categories: Political Theatre

Transcript here.

Before you bet on the ponies, you gotta read the Racing Form.

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on The Evil of iPods · Categories: It Is To Laugh

A Connecticut man was so engrossed with the tunes on his iPod that he didn’t realize his house was on fire — until his alarm company called.

Now, where did I put my Iriver.

If my insurance was with an incompetent, bankrupt company, I’d look elsewhere also.

(The good news is that none of my insurance companies are in the news.)

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on Oh, for Pete’s Sake · Categories: Give Me a Break

It’s a dog; it’s not a symbol.

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on On Maturation · Categories: Personal Musings

When I was 13, I was conservative too, like this young ‘un.

All the white folks around me considered themselves conservative, and, ultimately, Goldwater swept the county.

Why? They were horribly afraid that the evil Democrats were going to end Our Way of Life: Jim Crow segregation. There was other reasons also, but that was the the main one. And, remember, this was in a part of the South where the outward trappings of segregation were nowhere near as brutal as they were in parts of the Deep South.

What happened?

Answer below the Fold

28 February 2009 · Comments Off on “Pay for Performance” · Categories: Political Economy

On the other side of the Big Pond (for perspective, one pound UK = a little less than one and a half dollars US):

The Guardian has revealed that the board of HBOS (the initials are apparently meaningless; it was a British Citigroup type thingee until it failed and got eated–ed.), which yesterday reported a £10.1bn loss for 2008, may have walked away with combined payments of up to £4.5m. None of the executives at HBOS were offered a place on the board of the merged group after Lloyds TSB rescued the collapsing bank.

Most of the focus last night was on Peter Cummings, the executive responsible for the HBOS division that caused huge losses. He is thought to have received one year’s salary and benefits of £800,000 when he left the bank last month and started receiving his £350,000-a-year pension at the age of 53. Executives close to 55 are entitled to have their pensions topped up, which suggests that Cummings’s £5.9m pension pot will have been enhanced.

The Booman reminds us of what tax rates used to be.

Note that he is not recommending returning to Eisenhower-era marginal tax rates; he is simply giving his other comments some perspective.

Nevertheless, this passage–almost an aside in the context of his larger article–illustrates why Republican Economic Theory (AKA the Laughable Curve), the theory that the cure-all for society’s ills is to make the rich richer, fails. The theory denies human nature.

The money doesn’t trickle down; it trickles out:

I want to ask you if you have ever looked at a chart of the highest marginal tax rates since the income tax was created in 1913? Take a look because it’s instructive. Obama has made some sweeping proposals, but he hasn’t proposed restoring tax rates to anything close to what they were for the first six years of Reagan’s administration, let alone the 91% rate that prevailed under Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy. Ask yourself a question. If every dollar a CEO made over $500,000 was taxed at 91%, would he or she bother asking for 20 million? Would any board even consider giving 18 million to the government just to give two million to their CEO? Of course not.

It’s the Republican way.

If they can’t make the rich richer, they will still shaft the poor.

This is not a commentary on the stimulus bill. Whether it will undo the damage of years of Republican rule is still a great unknown.

Rather, this points out what this kerfuffle reveals about Republicanism.

Deadender Republican Governors are talking about rejecting portions of the stimulus bill.

Not surprisingly, the portions they are talking about rejecting are the portions designed to help the unemployed.

Nothing better shows that the Republican Party does not care about working–or in this case, out-of-working–persons who are in that condition because of Republican Economic Theory.

John Cole sums it up.

The Republican Party–The Party of Privilege since 1868. A pox on the lot of ’em.

27 February 2009 · Comments Off on Swift Booting Jindal · Categories: First Looks

Jon Swift discusses reaction to his recent post, which I discussed here. A nugget:

Unfortunately, however, some people apparently took offense to referring to Gov. Jindal as a “slumdog millionaire,” such as Amitabh Pal, writing on a website called The Progressive, which claims to have been on the Internet since 1909, which strikes me as being highly unlikely. He wrote that “comments relating to [Gov. Jindal’s] Indian background” are “repugnant” and insultingly referred to my piece as “satirical.”

27 February 2009 · Comments Off on Not That I Would Have Had an Opportunity to Fly Them Anyway . . . · Categories: It Is To Laugh

. . . but

“One thing we have looked at in the past and are looking at again is the possibility of maybe putting a coin slot on the toilet door so that people might actually have to spend a pound ($1.43) to spend a penny in future,” O’Leary told BBC television.

He said this would not inconvenience passengers traveling without cash. “I don’t think there is anybody in history that has got on board a Ryanair aircraft with less than a pound.”

Frankly, I think this is going to increase the number of mid-air accidents.

27 February 2009 · Comments Off on This Week’s Dustbiters · Categories: Political Economy

Not getting no more toasters from these folks. They’ve been nationalized and given to someone else.

Security Savings Bank, Henderson, NV

Heritage Community Bank, Glenwood, IL

You can bank on it.

The days of the little match girl appear to have succumbed to invitro fertilization.

Now it’s big match girls:

Drawn by payments of up to $10,000, an increasing number of women are offering to sell their eggs at U.S. fertility clinics as a way to make money amid the financial crisis.

27 February 2009 · Comments Off on “Masters of the Universe” · Categories: Political Economy

’nuff said:

Banks insured by the FDIC posted a collective loss of $26.2 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008, the agency said Thursday, as the percentage of charged off loans tied a quarterly record of 1.91%.

The grim results compared to a $575 million profit during the fourth quarter of 2007.


The U.S. economy was hitting on virtually no cylinders in the fourth quarter, as gross domestic product fell at the fastest pace since 1982 on sharp declines in consumer spending, investment and exports, the government said Friday.

GDP fell at a 6.2% seasonally adjusted annualized pace in the final three months of 2008, revised from the initial estimate of a 3.8% drop, the Commerce Department reported. It was the worst decline in GDP since a 6.4% decrease in the first quarter of 1982.

Hilzoy has a thought (Via Andrew Sullivan).

BogusBonus worthy.