From Pine View Farm

Facebook Frolics 2

Jeff Gelles thinks that persons who bought into the Facebook IPO were blinded by the hype. A nugget:

Facebook’s prospectus, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in February and amended several times since, gave detailed warnings about some of the risks that could undermine the company’s ambition “to make the world more open and connected” and to profit handsomely as a result.

For example, the prospectus warned repeatedly that Facebook was seeing a shift among users to mobile apps – 488 million of its monthly active users connected through mobile devices sometime in March, it said.

(snip)

So how was that IPO share price determined? In theory, it was based on factors such as the company’s so-called enterprise value, and complex models estimating the worth today of tomorrow’s profits.

But experts say that a sizable part of the calculation – say, the difference between setting the IPO price at $25 vs. $38 – isn’t about the supply and demand for company’s services, but about the supply and demand for shares of a big-buzz IPO.

At Balloon Juice, mistermix has a slightly different take:

As far as I can tell, Zuckerberg just wanted to cash in.

If you are going to follow either of the links, follow the latter. The sentence after the one I quoted pretty much sums it up.

Share

2 comments

  1. George

    May 24, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Right on. Cringely’s still around? Gawd. The few who made out were Zuckerberg, the odious fellow in the Tom Tomorrow cartoon now famously known as a tax evader, the also odious Peter Thiel, and still another odious guy, Sean Parker, a coke head who got wealthy off Napster, another thoroughly failed but famous for ripping off others digital music operation. Quite the menagerie of confidence men. 

     
  2. Frank

    May 24, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    The question remains, is it BPD or NPD.