Share

Shorter Dick Polman: The corporate media will go absurd lengths to maintain its pretense that “both sides.”

Also, too.

Share

Share

Mock news headline:

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Boy to Danae:  Let me get this straight.  You want me to cherry-pick science to use as evidence that the stuff you just made up is factual?  Danae:  Yes, please.  Boy:  Well, the science community has a word for that kind of practice, Danae.  Danae:  Mainstream?  Boy:  I was going to say intellectual dishonesty, but that works too.


Click for the original image.

Share

Two men standing at door to computer lab.  One says to the other,


Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

Via Raw Story.

Share

Trump falls on his face, as one bystander says to another,

Via Balloon Juice.

Share

Thom looks at the coverage of the Presidential campaign in the era of our “Duck Dynasty” and “Naked and Afraid” media and is less than sanguine.

Share

One of the screwier trends to emerge from Europe lately has been efforts to ban burqas and “burquinis” (and this is the United States of America–we know something about screwy); one column I saw somewhere in a US paper I forget where about Nice’s recent banning of the burquini was headlined something like “Leave It to the French To Outlaw Modesty.”

Der Spiegel attempts to understand the movement in Europe, and particularly in Germany, to “ban the burqa.” It concludes that the movement has little to do with religion and everything to do with domestic politics and attempts to co-opt the European far right. Here’s an excerpt, but I urge you to follow the link and read it in its entirety.

In the final analysis, the debate is really about fear — the fear German conservatives have of the right-wing populist party Alternative for Germany. And our fear of Islam. The burqa — or more precisely, full body veils worn by Muslim women — has become the symbol of everything that we reject in Islam. And when an enlightened society becomes engulfed in a debate over a symbolic problem, then this fear must be pretty big indeed.

Share

PoliticalProf.

Share

Image:  The Republican Platform Heathcare:  Just die. Economic Recovery:  More tax cuts for the wealthy. Jobs:  Low pay/Part time/No benefits. Women's Rights:  Back to the 50's. Civil Rights:  Back to the 50's. Gay Rights:  Back to the 50's. Social Security:  Give it to Wall Street. Energy:  Frack, Baby, Frack. Environment:  Destroy it one well at a time. National Debt:  Cut programs, buy more weapons. Wall Street Reform:  The banks own everything. The American Dream:  Unending debt.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Thom explains how ISIS arose from the Neoliberal paradise resulting from President George the Worst’s Great and Glorious Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq.

Share

At the Ashland, Oregon, Daily Tidings, Herb Rothschild posits that we are seeing a second Civil Rights Movement. Whereas the first was directed at legally-enforced discrimination (Jim Crow laws, segregated public institutions, red-lining neighborhoods and the like), this one is directed at gaining social equality, that is, equality in deed, not just in word.*

Just as the first Civil Rights Movement engendered opposition, so too has this one, as the Republican Party has become little more than the Party of the New Secesh. An excerpt:

Image of Trump supporters displaying Confederate battle ensign with This year is shaping up to be for the second struggle what 1964-1965 was for the first. On one side, Republican officials at every level have been openly combative since a black person was elected president. Now their George Wallace has emerged, and this time they’ve embraced him. Hate speech and hate crimes are increasing. In April the Southern Poverty Law Center published research indicating the Trump campaign is inflaming racial and ethnic tensions in U.S. classrooms nationwide. On the other side, graphic exposure by phone cameras has made routine police violence against people of color no longer tolerable and sparked renewed grassroots activism.

Do please read the rest.

Image via Michael-in-Norfolk.
__________________

*The actual extent to which “equality in word,” as opposed to “equality in deed,” has been achieved, of course, is arguable and has been spotty, at best.

It is not just chance that, until the rise of Donald Trump, though, racists have been restricted to speaking in code since the 1970s. Now they’ve dropped the codes as they rally for racism.

Share

Two men on bench, one, labeled


Click for the original image.

Share